Fund Comparison

Active Super vs HESTA — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict HESTA is cheaper at $50k ($408/yr vs $418/yr). HESTA leads on 10-year returns (8.30% vs 7.50%).

Fund Overview

Active Super

TypeIndustry
Established2023
TrusteeLGSS Pty Limited
HQ StateNSW
Members100K
Assets (AUM)$22B

HESTA

TypeIndustry
Established1987
TrusteeH.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members1.0M
Assets (AUM)$75B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentActive SuperHESTA
Admin Fee (flat)$78$78
Admin Fee (%)0.15%0.08%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.05%0.10%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.12%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceActive SuperHESTA
$10,000$146$144
$25,000$248$243
$50,000$418$408
$100,000$758$738
$250,000$1,778$1,728
$500,000$3,478$3,378

Performance Comparison

PeriodActive SuperHESTA
1-Year10.80%11.80%
3-Year7.50%8.10%
5-Year7.80%8.30%
7-Year7.80%8.40%
10-Year7.50%8.30%
FY20248.50%9.00%
FY20239.50%10.50%
FY2022-2.80%-2.90%
FY202118.50%19.50%
FY2020-0.20%-0.10%
FY20197.80%8.50%
FY20189.50%10.50%
FY201711.50%12.80%
FY20163.50%4.00%
FY20159.50%10.50%

Insurance Comparison

Active Super

InsurerMetLife Insurance
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

HESTA

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeActive SuperHESTA
25N/A$140
30N/A$235
35N/A$395
40N/A$600
45N/A$920
50N/A$1,420
55N/A$2,100
60N/A$3,000

APRA Heatmap Ratings

Active Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

HESTA

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

Active Super

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

HESTA

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionYes
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

Active Super

App RatingsiOS 4.1 / Android 3.9
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints4.0 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

HESTA

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.8 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

Verdict

On fees, HESTA is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, HESTA costs $408 per year compared to $418 for Active Super — a difference of $10 annually. That gap is small enough that it should not be the deciding factor between these two funds.

Looking at long-term performance, HESTA holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.30% versus 7.50% for Active Super — a gap of 0.80% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, Active Super uses MetLife Insurance while HESTA is backed by TAL Life Limited. HESTA charges around $600/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, HESTA has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.8 per 10,000 members compared to 4.0 for the other.

Active Super is best suited for public sector workers, while HESTA targets nurses healthcare workers, aged care workers. The two funds also serve different industries: Active Super focuses on local government, transport, while HESTA targets healthcare, aged care. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read Active Super Review Read HESTA Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.