Fund Comparison

Active Super vs LUCRF Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict LUCRF Super is cheaper at $50k ($406/yr vs $418/yr). both match on 10-year returns at 7.50%.

Fund Overview

Active Super

TypeIndustry
Established2023
TrusteeLGSS Pty Limited
HQ StateNSW
Members100K
Assets (AUM)$22B

LUCRF Super

TypeIndustry
Established1978
TrusteeAustralianSuper Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members140K
Assets (AUM)$10B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentActive SuperLUCRF Super
Admin Fee (flat)$78$91
Admin Fee (%)0.15%0.10%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.05%0.05%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceActive SuperLUCRF Super
$10,000$146$154
$25,000$248$248
$50,000$418$406
$100,000$758$721
$250,000$1,778$1,666
$500,000$3,478$3,241

Performance Comparison

PeriodActive SuperLUCRF Super
1-Year10.80%10.50%
3-Year7.50%7.20%
5-Year7.80%7.00%
7-Year7.80%7.50%
10-Year7.50%7.50%
FY20248.50%8.00%
FY20239.50%9.50%
FY2022-2.80%-3.50%
FY202118.50%18.50%
FY2020-0.20%-1.00%
FY20197.80%7.50%
FY20189.50%9.20%
FY201711.50%11.50%
FY20163.50%3.50%
FY20159.50%9.50%

Insurance Comparison

Active Super

InsurerMetLife Insurance
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

LUCRF Super

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeActive SuperLUCRF Super
25N/A$145
30N/A$245
35N/A$400
40N/A$615
45N/A$960
50N/A$1,480
55N/A$2,200
60N/A$3,100

APRA Heatmap Ratings

Active Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

LUCRF Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

Active Super

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

LUCRF Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

Active Super

App RatingsiOS 4.1 / Android 3.9
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints4.0 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

LUCRF Super

App RatingsiOS 4.7 / Android 4.5
AdviceVia AustralianSuper
AFCA Complaints3.6 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, LUCRF Super is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, LUCRF Super costs $406 per year compared to $418 for Active Super — a difference of $12 annually. That gap is small enough that it should not be the deciding factor between these two funds.

Both funds have delivered identical 10-year returns of 7.50%, so the choice between them will come down to fees, insurance, and personal suitability rather than raw performance.

On insurance, Active Super uses MetLife Insurance while LUCRF Super is backed by TAL Life Limited. LUCRF Super charges around $615/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, LUCRF Super has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.6 per 10,000 members compared to 4.0 for the other.

Active Super is best suited for public sector workers, while LUCRF Super targets retail workers. The two funds also serve different industries: Active Super focuses on local government, transport, while LUCRF Super targets retail, warehouse. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read Active Super Review Read LUCRF Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.