Fund Comparison

Cbus vs Equip Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict Cbus is cheaper at $50k ($393/yr vs $438/yr). Cbus leads on 10-year returns (8.40% vs 7.80%).

Fund Overview

Cbus

TypeIndustry
Established1984
TrusteeUnited Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members900K
Assets (AUM)$85B

Equip Super

TypeIndustry
Established1931
TrusteeTogethr Trustees Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members100K
Assets (AUM)$35B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentCbusEquip Super
Admin Fee (flat)$78$78
Admin Fee (%)0.00%0.16%
Investment Fee0.58%0.50%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.05%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceCbusEquip Super
$10,000$141$150
$25,000$236$258
$50,000$393$438
$100,000$708$798
$250,000$1,653$1,878
$500,000$3,228$3,678

Performance Comparison

PeriodCbusEquip Super
1-Year11.50%11.00%
3-Year8.20%7.80%
5-Year8.40%8.00%
7-Year8.50%8.00%
10-Year8.40%7.80%
FY20248.80%8.50%
FY202310.20%9.80%
FY2022-2.20%-2.80%
FY202120.50%19.00%
FY20200.20%-0.20%
FY20198.20%8.00%
FY201810.20%9.80%
FY201712.80%12.00%
FY20164.50%3.80%
FY201510.20%10.00%

Insurance Comparison

Cbus

InsurerMetLife Insurance
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Equip Super

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeCbusEquip Super
25$160N/A
30$270N/A
35$450N/A
40$690N/A
45$1,080N/A
50$1,650N/A
55$2,450N/A
60$3,500N/A

APRA Heatmap Ratings

Cbus

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

Equip Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

Cbus

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Equip Super

Total Options9
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

Cbus

App RatingsiOS 4.4 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included; Cbus coordinators on building sites
AFCA Complaints3.9 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

Equip Super

App RatingsiOS 4.3 / Android 4.1
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints4.5 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, Cbus is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, Cbus costs $393 per year compared to $438 for Equip Super — a difference of $45 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, Cbus holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.40% versus 7.80% for Equip Super — a gap of 0.60% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, Cbus uses MetLife Insurance while Equip Super is backed by AIA Australia. Cbus charges around $690/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, Cbus has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.9 per 10,000 members compared to 4.5 for the other.

Cbus is best suited for construction workers, fifo workers, while Equip Super targets miners energy workers, public sector workers. The two funds also serve different industries: Cbus focuses on construction, building, while Equip Super targets energy, rail. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read Cbus Review Read Equip Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.