Fund Comparison

First Super vs HESTA — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict HESTA is cheaper at $50k ($408/yr vs $465/yr). HESTA leads on 10-year returns (8.30% vs 7.20%).

Fund Overview

First Super

TypeIndustry
Established1984
TrusteeFirst Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members50K
Assets (AUM)$6B

HESTA

TypeIndustry
Established1987
TrusteeH.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members1.0M
Assets (AUM)$75B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentFirst SuperHESTA
Admin Fee (flat)$85$78
Admin Fee (%)0.20%0.08%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.08%0.10%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.12%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceFirst SuperHESTA
$10,000$161$144
$25,000$275$243
$50,000$465$408
$100,000$845$738
$250,000$1,985$1,728
$500,000$3,885$3,378

Performance Comparison

PeriodFirst SuperHESTA
1-Year10.20%11.80%
3-Year7.00%8.10%
5-Year7.20%8.30%
7-Year7.50%8.40%
10-Year7.20%8.30%
FY20248.00%9.00%
FY20239.00%10.50%
FY2022-3.20%-2.90%
FY202118.00%19.50%
FY2020-0.50%-0.10%
FY20197.50%8.50%
FY20189.20%10.50%
FY201711.50%12.80%
FY20163.00%4.00%
FY20159.20%10.50%

Insurance Comparison

First Super

InsurerMetLife Insurance
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

HESTA

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeFirst SuperHESTA
25N/A$140
30N/A$235
35N/A$395
40N/A$600
45N/A$920
50N/A$1,420
55N/A$2,100
60N/A$3,000

APRA Heatmap Ratings

First Super

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityAttention

HESTA

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

First Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

HESTA

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionYes
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

First Super

App RatingsiOS 3.8 / Android 3.5
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints4.4 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

HESTA

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.8 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

Verdict

On fees, HESTA is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, HESTA costs $408 per year compared to $465 for First Super — a difference of $57 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, HESTA holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.30% versus 7.20% for First Super — a gap of 1.10% per annum. That performance spread is significant and would result in tens of thousands of dollars difference over a working life.

On insurance, First Super uses MetLife Insurance while HESTA is backed by TAL Life Limited. HESTA charges around $600/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, HESTA has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.8 per 10,000 members compared to 4.4 for the other.

First Super is best suited for construction workers, while HESTA targets nurses healthcare workers, aged care workers. The two funds also serve different industries: First Super focuses on timber, furniture, while HESTA targets healthcare, aged care. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read First Super Review Read HESTA Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.