Fund Comparison

First Super vs LUCRF Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict LUCRF Super is cheaper at $50k ($406/yr vs $465/yr). LUCRF Super leads on 10-year returns (7.50% vs 7.20%).

Fund Overview

First Super

TypeIndustry
Established1984
TrusteeFirst Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members50K
Assets (AUM)$6B

LUCRF Super

TypeIndustry
Established1978
TrusteeAustralianSuper Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members140K
Assets (AUM)$10B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentFirst SuperLUCRF Super
Admin Fee (flat)$85$91
Admin Fee (%)0.20%0.10%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.08%0.05%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceFirst SuperLUCRF Super
$10,000$161$154
$25,000$275$248
$50,000$465$406
$100,000$845$721
$250,000$1,985$1,666
$500,000$3,885$3,241

Performance Comparison

PeriodFirst SuperLUCRF Super
1-Year10.20%10.50%
3-Year7.00%7.20%
5-Year7.20%7.00%
7-Year7.50%7.50%
10-Year7.20%7.50%
FY20248.00%8.00%
FY20239.00%9.50%
FY2022-3.20%-3.50%
FY202118.00%18.50%
FY2020-0.50%-1.00%
FY20197.50%7.50%
FY20189.20%9.20%
FY201711.50%11.50%
FY20163.00%3.50%
FY20159.20%9.50%

Insurance Comparison

First Super

InsurerMetLife Insurance
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

LUCRF Super

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeFirst SuperLUCRF Super
25N/A$145
30N/A$245
35N/A$400
40N/A$615
45N/A$960
50N/A$1,480
55N/A$2,200
60N/A$3,100

APRA Heatmap Ratings

First Super

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityAttention

LUCRF Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

First Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

LUCRF Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

First Super

App RatingsiOS 3.8 / Android 3.5
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints4.4 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

LUCRF Super

App RatingsiOS 4.7 / Android 4.5
AdviceVia AustralianSuper
AFCA Complaints3.6 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, LUCRF Super is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, LUCRF Super costs $406 per year compared to $465 for First Super — a difference of $59 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, LUCRF Super holds the edge with a 10-year return of 7.50% versus 7.20% for First Super — a gap of 0.30% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, First Super uses MetLife Insurance while LUCRF Super is backed by TAL Life Limited. LUCRF Super charges around $615/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, LUCRF Super has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.6 per 10,000 members compared to 4.4 for the other.

First Super is best suited for construction workers, while LUCRF Super targets retail workers. The two funds also serve different industries: First Super focuses on timber, furniture, while LUCRF Super targets retail, warehouse. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read First Super Review Read LUCRF Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.