Fund Comparison

HESTA vs LegalSuper — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict HESTA is cheaper at $50k ($408/yr vs $501/yr). HESTA leads on 10-year returns (8.30% vs 7.00%).

Fund Overview

HESTA

TypeIndustry
Established1987
TrusteeH.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members1.0M
Assets (AUM)$75B

LegalSuper

TypeIndustry
Established1988
TrusteeLegalSuper Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members50K
Assets (AUM)$8B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentHESTALegalSuper
Admin Fee (flat)$78$156
Admin Fee (%)0.08%0.18%
Investment Fee0.48%0.45%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.10%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.12%0.08%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceHESTALegalSuper
$10,000$144$225
$25,000$243$328
$50,000$408$501
$100,000$738$846
$250,000$1,728$1,881
$500,000$3,378$3,606

Performance Comparison

PeriodHESTALegalSuper
1-Year11.80%10.50%
3-Year8.10%7.00%
5-Year8.30%7.00%
7-Year8.40%7.20%
10-Year8.30%7.00%
FY20249.00%8.00%
FY202310.50%9.20%
FY2022-2.90%-3.50%
FY202119.50%17.50%
FY2020-0.10%-0.80%
FY20198.50%7.20%
FY201810.50%9.00%
FY201712.80%11.20%
FY20164.00%3.00%
FY201510.50%9.20%

Insurance Comparison

HESTA

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

LegalSuper

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeHESTALegalSuper
25$140N/A
30$235N/A
35$395N/A
40$600N/A
45$920N/A
50$1,420N/A
55$2,100N/A
60$3,000N/A

APRA Heatmap Ratings

HESTA

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

LegalSuper

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityUnderperforming

Investment Options

HESTA

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionYes
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

LegalSuper

Total Options10
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

HESTA

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.8 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

LegalSuper

App RatingsiOS 4.0 / Android 3.8
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints3.6 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, HESTA is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, HESTA costs $408 per year compared to $501 for LegalSuper — a difference of $93 annually. That is a substantial gap that will compound significantly over decades.

Looking at long-term performance, HESTA holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.30% versus 7.00% for LegalSuper — a gap of 1.30% per annum. That performance spread is significant and would result in tens of thousands of dollars difference over a working life.

On insurance, HESTA uses TAL Life Limited while LegalSuper is backed by AIA Australia. HESTA charges around $600/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, LegalSuper has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.6 per 10,000 members compared to 3.8 for the other.

HESTA is best suited for nurses healthcare workers, aged care workers, while LegalSuper targets lawyers legal workers. The two funds also serve different industries: HESTA focuses on healthcare, aged care, while LegalSuper targets legal. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read HESTA Review Read LegalSuper Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.