Fund Comparison

HESTA vs REST — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict REST is cheaper at $50k ($348/yr vs $408/yr). HESTA leads on 10-year returns (8.30% vs 7.80%).

Fund Overview

HESTA

TypeIndustry
Established1987
TrusteeH.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members1.0M
Assets (AUM)$75B

REST

TypeIndustry
Established1988
TrusteeRetail Employees Superannuation Pty Limited
HQ StateNSW
Members2.0M
Assets (AUM)$85B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentHESTAREST
Admin Fee (flat)$78$78
Admin Fee (%)0.08%0.00%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.10%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.12%0.07%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceHESTAREST
$10,000$144$132
$25,000$243$213
$50,000$408$348
$100,000$738$618
$250,000$1,728$1,428
$500,000$3,378$2,778

Performance Comparison

PeriodHESTAREST
1-Year11.80%10.80%
3-Year8.10%7.50%
5-Year8.30%7.80%
7-Year8.40%8.00%
10-Year8.30%7.80%
FY20249.00%8.50%
FY202310.50%9.20%
FY2022-2.90%-2.50%
FY202119.50%17.80%
FY2020-0.10%-0.50%
FY20198.50%7.50%
FY201810.50%9.50%
FY201712.80%11.80%
FY20164.00%3.50%
FY201510.50%9.80%

Insurance Comparison

HESTA

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

REST

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeHESTAREST
25$140$110
30$235$190
35$395$320
40$600$490
45$920$770
50$1,420$1,180
55$2,100$1,750
60$3,000$2,500

APRA Heatmap Ratings

HESTA

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

REST

Fee RatingBelow median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

HESTA

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionYes
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

REST

Total Options10
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

HESTA

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.8 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

REST

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.4 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-10pm AEST Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm Sat

Verdict

On fees, REST is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, REST costs $348 per year compared to $408 for HESTA — a difference of $60 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, HESTA holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.30% versus 7.80% for REST — a gap of 0.50% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, HESTA uses TAL Life Limited while REST is backed by AIA Australia. For a 40-year-old, REST's default premiums of around $490/year undercut HESTA's $600/year, giving REST the edge on insurance costs. On member satisfaction, REST has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.4 per 10,000 members compared to 3.8 for the other.

HESTA is best suited for nurses healthcare workers, aged care workers, while REST targets retail workers, young australians. The two funds also serve different industries: HESTA focuses on healthcare, aged care, while REST targets retail, fast food. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read HESTA Review Read REST Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.