Fund Comparison

HESTA vs Vision Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict HESTA is cheaper at $50k ($408/yr vs $428/yr). HESTA leads on 10-year returns (8.30% vs 7.20%).

Fund Overview

HESTA

TypeIndustry
Established1987
TrusteeH.E.S.T. Australia Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members1.0M
Assets (AUM)$75B

Vision Super

TypeIndustry
Established1947
TrusteeVision Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members90K
Assets (AUM)$14B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentHESTAVision Super
Admin Fee (flat)$78$78
Admin Fee (%)0.08%0.16%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.10%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.12%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceHESTAVision Super
$10,000$144$148
$25,000$243$253
$50,000$408$428
$100,000$738$778
$250,000$1,728$1,828
$500,000$3,378$3,578

Performance Comparison

PeriodHESTAVision Super
1-Year11.80%10.50%
3-Year8.10%7.20%
5-Year8.30%7.50%
7-Year8.40%7.50%
10-Year8.30%7.20%
FY20249.00%8.20%
FY202310.50%9.20%
FY2022-2.90%-3.00%
FY202119.50%18.00%
FY2020-0.10%-0.50%
FY20198.50%7.50%
FY201810.50%9.20%
FY201712.80%11.20%
FY20164.00%3.20%
FY201510.50%9.20%

Insurance Comparison

HESTA

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Vision Super

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeHESTAVision Super
25$140N/A
30$235N/A
35$395N/A
40$600N/A
45$920N/A
50$1,420N/A
55$2,100N/A
60$3,000N/A

APRA Heatmap Ratings

HESTA

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAbove median
SustainabilityPerforming

Vision Super

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

HESTA

Total Options8
Ethical/ESG OptionYes
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Vision Super

Total Options7
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

HESTA

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.8 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-8pm AEST Mon-Fri

Vision Super

App RatingsiOS 4.0 / Android 3.8
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints3.9 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, HESTA is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, HESTA costs $408 per year compared to $428 for Vision Super — a difference of $20 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, HESTA holds the edge with a 10-year return of 8.30% versus 7.20% for Vision Super — a gap of 1.10% per annum. That performance spread is significant and would result in tens of thousands of dollars difference over a working life.

On insurance, HESTA uses TAL Life Limited while Vision Super is backed by AIA Australia. HESTA charges around $600/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, HESTA has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.8 per 10,000 members compared to 3.9 for the other.

HESTA is best suited for nurses healthcare workers, aged care workers, while Vision Super targets public sector workers. The two funds also serve different industries: HESTA focuses on healthcare, aged care, while Vision Super targets local government, community services. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read HESTA Review Read Vision Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.