Fund Comparison

LUCRF Super vs REST — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict REST is cheaper at $50k ($348/yr vs $406/yr). REST leads on 10-year returns (7.80% vs 7.50%).

Fund Overview

LUCRF Super

TypeIndustry
Established1978
TrusteeAustralianSuper Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members140K
Assets (AUM)$10B

REST

TypeIndustry
Established1988
TrusteeRetail Employees Superannuation Pty Limited
HQ StateNSW
Members2.0M
Assets (AUM)$85B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentLUCRF SuperREST
Admin Fee (flat)$91$78
Admin Fee (%)0.10%0.00%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.05%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.07%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceLUCRF SuperREST
$10,000$154$132
$25,000$248$213
$50,000$406$348
$100,000$721$618
$250,000$1,666$1,428
$500,000$3,241$2,778

Performance Comparison

PeriodLUCRF SuperREST
1-Year10.50%10.80%
3-Year7.20%7.50%
5-Year7.00%7.80%
7-Year7.50%8.00%
10-Year7.50%7.80%
FY20248.00%8.50%
FY20239.50%9.20%
FY2022-3.50%-2.50%
FY202118.50%17.80%
FY2020-1.00%-0.50%
FY20197.50%7.50%
FY20189.20%9.50%
FY201711.50%11.80%
FY20163.50%3.50%
FY20159.50%9.80%

Insurance Comparison

LUCRF Super

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

REST

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeLUCRF SuperREST
25$145$110
30$245$190
35$400$320
40$615$490
45$960$770
50$1,480$1,180
55$2,200$1,750
60$3,100$2,500

APRA Heatmap Ratings

LUCRF Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

REST

Fee RatingBelow median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

LUCRF Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

REST

Total Options10
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

LUCRF Super

App RatingsiOS 4.7 / Android 4.5
AdviceVia AustralianSuper
AFCA Complaints3.6 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

REST

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.4 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-10pm AEST Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm Sat

Verdict

On fees, REST is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, REST costs $348 per year compared to $406 for LUCRF Super — a difference of $58 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, REST holds the edge with a 10-year return of 7.80% versus 7.50% for LUCRF Super — a gap of 0.30% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, LUCRF Super uses TAL Life Limited while REST is backed by AIA Australia. For a 40-year-old, REST's default premiums of around $490/year undercut LUCRF Super's $615/year, giving REST the edge on insurance costs. On member satisfaction, REST has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.4 per 10,000 members compared to 3.6 for the other.

LUCRF Super is best suited for retail workers, while REST targets retail workers, young australians. The two funds also serve different industries: LUCRF Super focuses on retail, warehouse, while REST targets retail, fast food. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read LUCRF Super Review Read REST Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.