Fund Comparison

LUCRF Super vs Vision Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict LUCRF Super is cheaper at $50k ($406/yr vs $428/yr). LUCRF Super leads on 10-year returns (7.50% vs 7.20%).

Fund Overview

LUCRF Super

TypeIndustry
Established1978
TrusteeAustralianSuper Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members140K
Assets (AUM)$10B

Vision Super

TypeIndustry
Established1947
TrusteeVision Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members90K
Assets (AUM)$14B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentLUCRF SuperVision Super
Admin Fee (flat)$91$78
Admin Fee (%)0.10%0.16%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.05%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.10%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceLUCRF SuperVision Super
$10,000$154$148
$25,000$248$253
$50,000$406$428
$100,000$721$778
$250,000$1,666$1,828
$500,000$3,241$3,578

Performance Comparison

PeriodLUCRF SuperVision Super
1-Year10.50%10.50%
3-Year7.20%7.20%
5-Year7.00%7.50%
7-Year7.50%7.50%
10-Year7.50%7.20%
FY20248.00%8.20%
FY20239.50%9.20%
FY2022-3.50%-3.00%
FY202118.50%18.00%
FY2020-1.00%-0.50%
FY20197.50%7.50%
FY20189.20%9.20%
FY201711.50%11.20%
FY20163.50%3.20%
FY20159.50%9.20%

Insurance Comparison

LUCRF Super

InsurerTAL Life Limited
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Vision Super

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeLUCRF SuperVision Super
25$145N/A
30$245N/A
35$400N/A
40$615N/A
45$960N/A
50$1,480N/A
55$2,200N/A
60$3,100N/A

APRA Heatmap Ratings

LUCRF Super

Fee RatingAround median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Vision Super

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

LUCRF Super

Total Options6
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Vision Super

Total Options7
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

LUCRF Super

App RatingsiOS 4.7 / Android 4.5
AdviceVia AustralianSuper
AFCA Complaints3.6 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Vision Super

App RatingsiOS 4.0 / Android 3.8
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints3.9 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, LUCRF Super is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, LUCRF Super costs $406 per year compared to $428 for Vision Super — a difference of $22 annually. Over a 30-year career, that difference compounds meaningfully.

Looking at long-term performance, LUCRF Super holds the edge with a 10-year return of 7.50% versus 7.20% for Vision Super — a gap of 0.30% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, LUCRF Super uses TAL Life Limited while Vision Super is backed by AIA Australia. LUCRF Super charges around $615/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, LUCRF Super has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.6 per 10,000 members compared to 3.9 for the other.

LUCRF Super is best suited for retail workers, while Vision Super targets public sector workers. The two funds also serve different industries: LUCRF Super focuses on retail, warehouse, while Vision Super targets local government, community services. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read LUCRF Super Review Read Vision Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.