Fund Comparison

REST vs Vision Super — Which Is Better?

A detailed side-by-side comparison for 2026. Fees, returns, insurance, and services.

Quick Verdict REST is cheaper at $50k ($348/yr vs $428/yr). REST leads on 10-year returns (7.80% vs 7.20%).

Fund Overview

REST

TypeIndustry
Established1988
TrusteeRetail Employees Superannuation Pty Limited
HQ StateNSW
Members2.0M
Assets (AUM)$85B

Vision Super

TypeIndustry
Established1947
TrusteeVision Super Pty Ltd
HQ StateVIC
Members90K
Assets (AUM)$14B

Fee Comparison

Fee ComponentRESTVision Super
Admin Fee (flat)$78$78
Admin Fee (%)0.00%0.16%
Investment Fee0.48%0.48%
Indirect Cost Ratio0.06%0.06%
Buy/Sell Spread0.07%0.10%

Total Annual Fee by Balance

BalanceRESTVision Super
$10,000$132$148
$25,000$213$253
$50,000$348$428
$100,000$618$778
$250,000$1,428$1,828
$500,000$2,778$3,578

Performance Comparison

PeriodRESTVision Super
1-Year10.80%10.50%
3-Year7.50%7.20%
5-Year7.80%7.50%
7-Year8.00%7.50%
10-Year7.80%7.20%
FY20248.50%8.20%
FY20239.20%9.20%
FY2022-2.50%-3.00%
FY202117.80%18.00%
FY2020-0.50%-0.50%
FY20197.50%7.50%
FY20189.50%9.20%
FY201711.80%11.20%
FY20163.50%3.20%
FY20159.80%9.20%

Insurance Comparison

REST

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
TPD CoverYes — unitised, opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Vision Super

InsurerAIA Australia
Death CoverYes — opt-out
TPD CoverYes — opt-out
IP CoverYes — opt-in

Annual Premium Comparison by Age

AgeRESTVision Super
25$110N/A
30$190N/A
35$320N/A
40$490N/A
45$770N/A
50$1,180N/A
55$1,750N/A
60$2,500N/A

APRA Heatmap Ratings

REST

Fee RatingBelow median
Return RatingAround median
SustainabilityPerforming

Vision Super

Fee RatingAbove median
Return RatingBelow median
SustainabilityPerforming

Investment Options

REST

Total Options10
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Vision Super

Total Options7
Ethical/ESG OptionNo
Indexed OptionNo
Direct InvestingNo

Member Services

REST

App RatingsiOS 4.5 / Android 4.2
AdviceLimited personal advice included
AFCA Complaints3.4 per 10k members
Call Centre8am-10pm AEST Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm Sat

Vision Super

App RatingsiOS 4.0 / Android 3.8
AdviceNot specified
AFCA Complaints3.9 per 10k members
Call CentreNot specified

Verdict

On fees, REST is the more affordable option. At a $50,000 balance, REST costs $348 per year compared to $428 for Vision Super — a difference of $80 annually. That is a substantial gap that will compound significantly over decades.

Looking at long-term performance, REST holds the edge with a 10-year return of 7.80% versus 7.20% for Vision Super — a gap of 0.60% per annum. While not enormous, that gap adds up over the compounding horizon of a superannuation balance.

On insurance, REST uses AIA Australia while Vision Super is backed by AIA Australia. REST charges around $490/year for a 40-year-old's default cover. On member satisfaction, REST has fewer AFCA complaints at 3.4 per 10,000 members compared to 3.9 for the other.

REST is best suited for retail workers, young australians, while Vision Super targets public sector workers. The two funds also serve different industries: REST focuses on retail, fast food, while Vision Super targets local government, community services. If your employer defaults to one of these funds, that alone may tip the decision.

Read REST Review Read Vision Super Review
Important information The information on SuperFind is general in nature and does not take into account your personal financial situation, needs, or objectives. It is not personal financial advice. Before making any financial decisions about your superannuation, consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser. Super fund data including fees and performance returns shown on this site were current as of April 2026 — always verify figures on the fund's website. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data sourced from APRA, ATO, and individual fund disclosures. SuperFind is a DecisionLab publication.